The Neo-Darwinian Fraud

Last column I discussed the historical transition of the methodology employed by the global elite in their never-ending quest to control the people and resources of planet earth.  Paramount is a shift from open confrontation with and violent suppression of liberation movements, to more subtle forms of psychological warfare waged via control and distortion of information via mass media.

This battle for our minds takes many forms, but begins by inserting key philosophical premises into the public consensus.  One of the most insidious of these is neo-Darwinism, which preaches “survival of the fittest” and reinforces the dominance paradigm.  This fraudulent worldview, reinforced by corporate-funded “scientific” research, needs to be deconstructed and discredited if we are to progress as a species.

Charles Darwin’s expedition was funded by European nobility.  He was himself a Freemason.  Despite this elite pedigree, Darwin’s research led him to one very important conclusion, and it was not the “survival of the fittest” mantra which the global elite have since employed to justify everything from colonialism and slavery to private central banking and monopoly capitalism.  Rather, Darwin’s central thesis was that the survival of a species was dependent on a high degree of cooperation within that species.

I grew up on a 2,000 acre ranch and have lived in the country almost my entire life.  I have hunted, trapped, fished, raised livestock and had pets.  I have hiked countless miles of backcountry trails where I’ve encountered grizzly bears, mountain goats, moose and wolverine.  My wife and I recently went on a safari in South Africa’s Kruger National Park.  Through all of these experiences I have never seen two wild animals locked in mortal combat.  What I have seen is cooperation at many levels, not only within species, but between species.

Take a walk in the woods and you will hear songbirds warning the fox that you are headed her way.  Observe a herd of deer and you will see the fit, healthy individuals watching out and waiting for the young, injured or sick members.  Visit Kruger and you will see warthogs sticking close to the zebras.  The zebras can see above the bushveld and watch for lions, while the smaller warthogs, with their razor-sharp tusks, can give a lion problems for long enough to allow a zebra to escape an ambush.

I had two dogs for nearly fifteen years.  Buck, the larger dog, deferred to Milo, the smaller but older dog, his entire life.  They never once had a physical confrontation.  Though Buck was easily the stronger of the two, he saw no need to be the “big dog”.  Buck knew that cooperation was a much easier path.  In turn Milo never abused his respected position of “elder”.

Of course confrontation occurs in the animal community, mostly during the rut and when food is scarce.  Boys will be boys.  And all living beings must eat.  But why does the Establishment media focus so much on these rare incidents and so little on the much more prevalent cooperation within the natural community?  Because doing so would shatter the myth that monopoly capitalism is a natural economic system.

The global elite have utilized this same phony version of neo-Darwinism in their portrayal of indigenous people.  We are told, usually when justifying some oil war for Exxon Mobil and Citibank, that “Indians were constantly at war (blah, blah, blah)…too”  Yet any cultural anthropologist worth their salt will tell you that Native Americans rarely waged inter-tribal war during the 100,000+ years before European contact.

Pre-contact tribes didn’t have one “alpha” chief.  They had tribal councils, consisting of elderly men and women whose life experiences were valued.  Young, physically strong hunters were always expected to show deference to these elders.  Among the Lakota, the hunter who made the kill always ate last, reinforcing the virtue of humility and discouraging arrogance.  Might was not right in tribal society.

The European nobility saw this socialist tribal model as a threat to their growing industrial capitalist empire.  So their hired guns- led by Albert Pike, founder of both Scottish-Rite Freemasonry and the Ku Klux Klan- launched the Indian Wars.  These mercenaries taught Indians to collect scalps, paying them a bounty before sending the scalps back to the Euro-inbreds, who did god knows what with them.

Pike’s troops then hand-picked tribal chiefs, always of low character and easily bought.  These “chiefs” replaced the traditional tribal councils, signed treaties giving away tribal land, and were bribed into attacking other tribes to create the disunity necessary for the global elite to destroy the Native American socialist model.

Neo-Darwinism is a diabolical, fear-laden way of thinking about the world.  It is a reality at odds with nature.  The dominance paradigm it justifies is a Western industrial human construct, conjured up as a rationale for past, present and future subjugation of the planet and its people by the Illuminati bloodline elite.

One last thought:  If control over the global economy really is as simple as “survival of the fittest” and “alpha male dominance”, shouldn’t Evander Holyfield own Bank of America, while Goldman Sachs’ scrawny CEO Lloyd Blankfein rents a cockroach-infested shack in Harlem?

Dean Henderson is the author of four books: Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries, Das Kartell der Federal Reserve & Stickin’ it to the Matrix. You can subscribe free to his weekly Left Hook column @ www.deanhenderson.wordpress.com

About these ads