you're reading...
Hill 'n Holler Review Columns

Fear of Nature Drives Reactionary Political Views

A few columns back I discussed the historical transition of the methodology employed by the global elite in their never-ending quest to control the people and resources of planet earth.  Paramount is a shift from open confrontation with and violent suppression of liberation movements, to a more subtle form of psychological warfare waged via control and distortion of information, resulting in a misinformed, fearful and docile populace.

This battle for our minds takes many forms, but begins by inserting key philosophical premises into the public consensus.  One of the most insidious of these is a neo-Darwinian worldview, which preaches “survival of the fittest” and reinforces the dominance paradigm.  This fraudulent philosophical underpinning, which has become a sort of global religious cult, is used to justify all kinds of historical and present-day injustice and exploitation and needs to be deconstructed and discredited if we are to progress as a species.

Darwin’s expedition was funded by European nobility and he was himself a Freemason.  Despite this elite bias, Darwin’s research led him to one very important conclusion, and it was not the “survival of the fittest” mantra which the global elite has since employed to justify everything from colonialism and slavery to private central banking and monopoly capitalism.  Rather, Darwin’s central thesis was that the survival of a species was dependent on a high degree of cooperation within that species.

I grew up on a 2,000 acre ranch and have lived in the country almost my entire life.  I have hunted, trapped, fished, raised livestock and had pets.  I have hiked countless miles of backcountry trails where I’ve encountered grizzly bears, mountain goats, moose and wolverine.  My wife and I recently went on a safari in South Africa’s Kruger National Park.  Through all of these experiences I have never seen two wild animals locked in mortal combat.  What I have seen is cooperation at many levels, not only within species, but between species.

Take a walk in the woods and you will hear songbirds warning the fox that you are headed his way.  Observe a herd of deer and you will see the fit, healthy individuals watching out and waiting for the young, injured or sick members.  Visit Kruger and you will see warthogs sticking close to the zebras.  The zebras can see above the bushveld and watch for lions.  The smaller warthogs, with their razor-sharp tusks, can give a lion problems for long enough to allow a zebra to escape an ambush.

I had two dogs for nearly 15 years.  Buck, the larger dog, deferred to Milo, the smaller but older dog, his entire life.  They never once had a physical confrontation, and though Buck was easily the strongest of the two, he saw no need to be the “alpha” dog.  This entire way of thinking is a human construct based on a dominance paradigm that does not exist in nature.  Buck knew that cooperation was a much easier path.  In turn Milo never abused his respected position of “elder”.

Of course confrontation occurs in the animal community, mostly during the rut.  But why does the Establishment focus so much on these rare incidents and so little on the much more prevalent cooperative nature of animals?  National Geographic- part of the global elite’s Royal Geographical Society- is an important spearhead in promoting the “dominance paradigm” worldview.  Do you know how long their photographers wait to get a shot of a lion killing a wildebeest or two Rocky Mountain sheep butting heads?  These are the most prized of photographs, so they wait.  And wait.  But why?  Is this what sells magazines or gets viewers on Discovery Channel?  Probably.  But why do these shots sell?  And what is the agenda promoted by portraying nature as such a brutal and dangerous place?

The global elite have promoted the same version of neo-Darwinism in their portrayal of indigenous people.  We are told, usually when justifying some oil war for ExxonMobil and Citibank, that “Indians were constantly at war…too”  Another lie.  Anyone who has seriously studied Native America history or cultural anthropology knows that war between tribes was actually quite rare for the 100,000+ years before European contact.  Tribes didn’t have one “alpha” chief.  They had tribal councils, consisting largely of elderly men AND women whose life experiences were valued.  Young, physically strong hunters were always expected to show deference to these elders.  Among the Lakota, the hunter who made the kill always ate last.  Might was most definitely not right in tribal society.

The global elite saw the socialist tribal model as a threat to their growing industrial capitalist empire.  So their hired guns- led by Albert Pike, the 33rd Degree founder of Scottish-Rite Freemasonry, and the Ku Klux Klan- launched the Indian Wars in the West.  These mercenaries taught Indians to collect scalps, paying them a bounty before sending the scalps to the British elite who did god knows what with them.  Pike’s troops hand-picked tribal chiefs, usually of very low character and thus easily bought.  These “chiefs” replaced the traditional tribal councils, signed treaties giving away tribal land, and were bribed into attacking other tribes to create the disunity necessary for the global elite to steal Native American land.

One last thing:  If control over the global economy really is as simple as “survival of the fittest” and “alpha male dominance”, why doesn’t Mike Tyson own Bank of America?  And why isn’t Goldman Sachs’ scrawny little CEO Lloyd Blankfein renting a shack in Harlem?

Dean Henderson is the author of five books: Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries, Das Kartell der Federal Reserve, Stickin’ it to the Matrix & The Federal Reserve Cartel.  You can subscribe free to his weekly Left Hook column @

About these ads


9 thoughts on “Fear of Nature Drives Reactionary Political Views

  1. Darwin’s full quote actually was: “Survival will not come to the strongest, nor the smartest, but to those who demonstrate the greatest capacity for adaptability.” Amazing how the elite have re-mixed and garbled that message to further their own philosophical and practical agenda.
    Adaptability, and cooperation, as you have pointed out, are truly the only keys to our future.

    Posted by sistertongue | November 25, 2012, 3:53 pm
    • Maybe the ‘scariest’ thing about Darwin’s conclusion was that it indicates the probability of “morality” being something that can be explained without the hand of an Almighty God, & stone tablets with “Thou shalt not..” chiseled therein. (My own feeling is that mammalian morality owes its source to maternal compassion.) ^..^

      Posted by ridovem00 | November 26, 2012, 1:36 pm
    • Thanks for your insignts.

      Posted by elisabeth guss | January 26, 2014, 6:21 am
  2. Darwin’s views were deliberately twisted to create a paradigm of Social Darwinism, to justify the ruthless Victorian capitalist mentality of economic imperialism. Period. It never had any basis in fact. You are well-advised to read the works of Prince Peter Kropotkin, whose greatest work is “Mutual Aid”, based on his many years in Siberia observing animal behaviours when there were far more animals then there are now. His works disproved all the capitalist propaganda, but were not widely known or translated until long after his death.

    Posted by josephbc69 | November 26, 2012, 1:35 am
  3. Reblogged this on Marina Albin.

    Posted by marinaalbin | November 26, 2012, 8:12 am
  4. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. :) I think they are just promoting control trough fear. :(

    Posted by marinaalbin | November 26, 2012, 8:13 am
  5. Sociologist Bob Blain has written a whole book on that topic, titled “The Most Wealth for the Least Work through Cooperation”. I strongly recommend this book. He even has created a game for his students to make understanding that concept easier, downloadable for free here:

    Posted by Rabert von Dahrenhorst | November 26, 2012, 9:51 am
  6. One thing humans are reluctant to contemplate is their own Darwinian successors, those who adapted to changing conditions and whose genes then spread through the population. Will we be able to see this as it happens? Will we like what we see? It is my thesis that this is already happening, and is the root cause of virtually everything bad happening in the world today. Indigenous hunter-gatherers lived in small communities where what we now call “psychopathy” would never be tolerated. Only with the rise of agriculture and civilization have conditions become favorable for the genes for psychopathy to increase as a percentage of the population — large cities providing anonymity and hierarchical organizations to control. Humanity is now in the middle of a genetic emergency where we either get out in front of psychopathy and stop its spread, or we learn to live with a world run by and for Elitists with no conscience lording over the rest of us. All other battles are divide and conquer side-shows run by the Elitists themselves.

    Posted by Tom Ness | November 26, 2012, 7:47 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Join 5,701 other followers

Contact Left Hook to Make a Donation


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,701 other followers

%d bloggers like this: